Multichannel ring and star networks with limited channel conversion

ABSTRACT

A ring communication network comprising a plurality of nodes in which a single one of the nodes is configured for full channel conversion and the remaining nodes, other than the single node, are configured for no channel conversion. Links comprising no more than W channels couple the nodes.  
     The ring communication network also may comprise N nodes and links coupling the nodes for carrying data in W channels such that N≧2 log 2  W−1 where W is a power of 2. Each of the N nodes comprises switches connected such that each channel of a first one of the links adjacent any one of the N nodes can be switched to no more than W−1 channels of another one of the links adjacent any one node.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of co-pending non-provisional U.S. application Ser. No. 09/362,635, filed on Jul. 21, 1999, which is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/641,061, filed on Apr. 29, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,108,311.

GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS

The U.S. Government has a paid-up license in this invention and the right in limited circumstances to require the patent owner to license others on reasonable terms as provided for by the terms of Contract MDA972-95-C-0001 awarded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). The U.S. Government has certain rights in this invention.

PRIOR ART

A multichannel link comprises a number of channels, say W, between two sites. These channels may be transmitted separately (for example over parallel wires or fiber cables) or multiplexed on to one of a small number of wires or fibers using time or channel division multiplexing. Usually these links are realized in the form of line cards, one for each channel at each end of the link. A line card is a device that provides an interface between the I/O for the channel and the transmission medium. The set of line cards associated with each end of a link along with any associated multiplexing/demultiplexing unit is called a multiplexor.

One example is the IBM optical multiplexer system [1]. This system multiplexes up to ten full-duplex channels on to a single transmission link.

Multiplexors can be connected in a ring or star network configuration across multiple sites (herein called nodes). Nodes may be configured to allow pairs of channels to be connected to one another. This may be accomplished by some kind of switching at the node. For example, consider a network realized by line cards. In addition, consider two channels from different links, but where the links are incident to a common node. Each of these channels has a line card at the node. Suppose the line cards are connected. Then the channels may be connected to each other since the signal from one channel may be transferred to the other channel by going through the line cards and the connection between the line cards. If a pair of channels may be connected to one another, as for example, through a switching network, then we refer to them as being attached.

A node is said to be configured if pairs of its incident channels are attached. The network is said to be configured if each of its nodes is configured. For a network configuration, a node is said to have channel degree k if for each pair of its incident links, the channels of the links have the following property: each channel in one link is attached to k channels of the other link. A node has full channel conversion if its channel degree is W. A node is said to have fixed channel conversion if its channel degree is one. Suppose at each link in the network, the channels are numbered {, 0,1, . . . , W−1}. Then a node is said to have no channel conversion if its channel degree is such that channels with the same number are attached.

A network is configured so that end-to-end communication connections between pairs of nodes may be established in the network. An end-to-end communication connection is specified by a path in the network, and it is realized by a set of channels, one from each link along the path so that channels that are incident to a common node are attached through the node. This realization allows a signal that is sent from one end of the path to be received at the other end by being transported along the attached channels. The path corresponding to an end-to-end communication connection will be referred to as a route, and a set of channels that realizes the end-to-end communication connection will be referred to as a channel assignment for the route.

Note that it is straightforward to realize a set of end-to-end communication connections in a network configured so that each node has full channel conversion. It is more cost effective to have nodes configured so that some or all nodes have channel degree less than W, i.e., allow only limited switching capability at the nodes. However, in general, networks configured to have less than full channel conversion at each node may require more channels to realize the same end-to-end communication connections than if they were configured to have full channel conversion at each node.

A request is a set of routes and corresponds to a set of end-to-end communication connections. The load of a request is the value max_(eεE) λ_(e), where λ_(e) denotes the number of routes using link e and E denotes the set of links in the network. For a network configuration, a channel assignment for a request is a collection of assignments for routes, one per route of the request, such that each channel is assigned to at most one route of the request, i.e., no two routes will share a channel. Note that a channel assignment for a request realizes all of the end-to-end communication connections corresponding to the request.

Prior art focuses on networks with either no channel conversion or networks with full channel conversion. For the case where all nodes have full channel conversion, (i.e., k=W), a sufficient (and necessary) condition for feasibility is W≧λ_(max), where λ_(max) is the load for the request. For the case when all nodes have no channel conversion (hence at each node, k=1), [2] gives a method that performs a channel assignment using W≧2λ_(max) on a ring network and W≧3/2λ_(max) for a star network.

Prior art also proposes several heuristic channel assignment schemes for networks without channel conversion that may not be efficient in terms of using a small number of channels to perform the channel assignment. For example, see [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. For the case of limited channel conversion, [9, 10] propose some network configurations and some heuristic channel assignment schemes for these configurations that again may not be efficient in terms of using a small number of channels to perform the channel assignment. Prior art does not propose configuration methods and efficient channel assignment techniques for networks with limited channel conversion.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention proposes configurations of ring and star networks with limited channel conversion to efficiently support connections. In addition, algorithms are provided to efficiently assign channels to connections.

More specifically, it is an object of this invention to provide a cost effective network by using nodes with limited switching capability.

It is also an object of this invention to efficiently assign channels to links of a network with nodes having limited switching capabilities so as to maximize network resources.

More generally, it is the overall object of this invention to configure a network and assign channels to the network in a cost effective manner.

The invention achieves the following results:

In a ring network with N nodes, the invention proposes a network configuration and for this configuration, proposes a channel assignment method for any request with load λ_(max) that uses

-   -   λ_(max) channels with channel degree at most k=2 at each node         provided N≧2 log₂ λ_(max)−1 and W is a power of two.     -   λ_(max) channels with channel degree at most Δ+1 at each node,         where Δ>1, provided N≧log_(Δ)λ_(max).

In a star network, the invention proposes a configuration and for this configuration, proposes a channel assignment method for any request with load λ_(max) that uses λ_(max) channels with fixed conversion.

In a network with an arbitrary topology the invention proposes a configuration and for this configuration, proposes a channel assignment method for any request with load λ_(max) where no connection is more than 2 hops, that uses λ_(max) channels with fixed conversion.

Accordingly, this invention provides for a method of configuring nodes in a ring communications network wherein one of the nodes of ring is designated as a primary node, which is configured to have full channel conversion. That is, any two channels between its two incident links can be connected to each other. The other nodes of the network are configured to have no channel conversion. That is, any channel c on one of the incident links of a node is connected to the same channel c on the other incident link of the node.

This invention also provides a method of assigning channels in a ring communications network which is configured as described in the previous paragraph. With the assignment scheme of the invention the paths used for end-to-end communication connections are divided into cut paths and uncut paths, where a cut path is a path that passes through the primary node, while an uncut path does not pass through the primary node. Each cut path p_(i) is divided into two paths a_(i) and b_(i) by splitting path p_(i) at the primary node, where the primary node becomes an end node for paths a_(i) and b_(i). The paths a_(i) and b_(i) are referred to as residual paths. Then, each link along each uncut path is assigned a single channel, and each link along a residual path is assigned the same channel. Thus, a cut path can use two different channels corresponding to its two residual paths.

This invention also comprises a network which is configured as above.

This invention also provides a method of configuring nodes of a ring communications network having multichannel multiplexed links. With this method, the N nodes of the ring are numbered consecutively starting at the primary node and proceeding in one direction around the ring. Also, the link between nodes i and (i+1) mod N is given the number i. Then, each of the nodes is configured such that channel c on link i may be connected to one of Δ+1 channels on link (i+1) mod N, where Δ is greater than or equal to 2 and where one of the channels on link (i+1) mod N is channel (C+1) mod W, where the other Δ channels on link (i+1) mod N are channels (C−k·Δ^(i)) mod W for k=0,1, . . . , Δ−1 and where W is the number of channels in each link. This invention also describes a method of assigning the channels in a ring communications network configured as described in the previous paragraph, and the details of this assignment scheme is described in claim 9 and in the specification.

This invention also describes a method of configuring the nodes in an arbitrary network having N nodes and E links, where each link is a multichannel multiplexed link having W channels, and where W is an even integer. With this aspect of the invention, the channels are numbered from 0 to W−1, and at each node, for channels i=0,1, . . . , W/2−1, channel i on one link is connected to channel w(i) on all other links incident to that node, where w(i)=i+W/2.

A final aspect of the invention is a method of assigning channels to the arbitrary network configured as in the previous paragraph. This assignment scheme is described in the specification and in claim 15.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a configuration of multiplexors in a ring network for the case of full conversion at one node and no conversion at the other nodes.

FIG. 2 shows a simplified diagram of a 4-node ring network and a sample request.

FIG. 3 shows the graph H, representing a Benes permutation network for the case of 4 wavelengths (W=4) along with a set of edge-disjoint paths in H.

FIG. 4 shows a configuration of multiplexors in a ring network corresponding to a Benes network configuration.

FIG. 5 shows the setting of the switches and the channel assignment for the request of FIG. 2 in a ring network with channel degree 2 for the configuration of FIG. 4.

FIG. 6 shows a configuration of multiplexors in a ring network for the case of channel degree 3.

FIG. 7 shows the setting of the switches and the channel assignment for the request of FIG. 2 in a ring network with channel degree 3 for the configuration of FIG. 6.

FIG. 8 shows a configuration of multiplexors in a star network with fixed channel conversion.

FIG. 9 (A) shows a simplified diagram of a star network with 4 end nodes and a sample request of routes. (B) shows how to direct the routes as described in the embodiment of the invention. (C) shows the construction of a bipartite graph and channel assignments for this request.

FIG. 10 shows the setting of the switches and the channel assignment for the request of FIG. 9 for the configuration of FIG. 8.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Ring Network

FIG. 1 shows the block diagram of multiplexors 101 connected in a ring network configuration. Each node 102 in the network consists of a pair of multiplexors. Two nodes are connected by a transmission link or medium 103. The figure shows 4 channels on each link. For each channel there is a line card 104 within each multiplexor 101. A line card consists of an I/O port 105, multiple local ports 106 and a line port 107 and a switch (not shown in the figure) that allows any pairs of these ports to be connected together. For the case of the ring network, the number of local ports per line card is at least the channel degree defined earlier. In FIG. 1 node 0 has channel degree 4 while other nodes have channel degree 1. Node 0 is called the primary node. The line ports of all the line cards within a multiplexor are connected to a mux/demux unit 108 which combines all the channels on to the transmission link. Within each node the line cards from one multiplexor are hard wired to the line cards in the other multiplexor according to a specific wiring pattern 109 given later. This wiring pattern determines which channels are attached to each other within the node. In node 0 for example, each channel is attached to all the channels. In the other nodes each channel is attached only to other channels with the same channel number.

In the subsequent discussion, we will provide feasibility results for the following network configurations: (i) one node has full channel conversion and the other nodes have no channel conversion, (ii) all nodes have channel degree at most two, (iii) all nodes have channel degree at most Δ+1, where Δ is an integer greater than one. In the discussion, we will assume, without loss of generality, the following:

-   -   each link has its channels numbered {0,1, . . . , W−1}, where W         is the number of channels per link;     -   nodes are numbered 0,1, . . . , N−1 around the ring, where N         denotes the number of nodes; and     -   for each i=0,1, . . . , N−1, the link between node i and node         (i+1) mod N is numbered i.         Configuration with Full Channel Conversion at One Node and No         Channel Conversion at Other Nodes

The ring network is configured so that one of its nodes has full channel conversion. This node is referred to as the primary node, and without loss of generality, let it be node 0. The other nodes have no channel conversion.

Suppose we are given a request {p₁, . . . ,p_(m)}, where m is the number of routes in the request. Then the following is a channel assignment for the request. First, refer to routes that pass through node 0 as cut routes and the rest of the routes as uncut. A set P of paths is generated as follows. Include each uncut route in P. For each cut route p_(i), cut (or split) it at node 0 into a pair of paths {a_(i), b_(i)} called residual paths such that each residual path includes node 0. Without loss of generality, let a_(i) correspond to the residual path that traverses link N−1, and let b_(i) correspond to the residual path that traverses link 0. Refer to a_(i) as the left residual path, and b_(i) as the right residual path. (For example, if N=5 and p_(i) is a path with the sequence of nodes 4-5-0-1-2 then the residual path a_(i) corresponds to 4-5-0 and b_(i) corresponds to 0-1-2). Include the residual paths in P.

Next, partition the paths in P into W subsets (P₀, P₁, . . . , P_(W−1)) such that paths in the same subset do not traverse common links of the ring network. We will refer to the partition (P₀. P₁ . . . , P_(W−1)) as a cut-and-color partition for the request. One way to find a cut-and-color partition is to assign channel numbers {0, . . . , W−1} to the paths in P such that paths with a common link have distinct numbers. This is like coloring paths in an interval graph [11, Sec.16.5] because no path of P crosses through node 0. Hence, we can use a greedy algorithm assignment that requires λ_(max) numbers [11, Sec.16.5]). [11] is hereby incorporated by reference. Then for i=0,1, . . . , W−1, all paths that have been assigned to channel number i are in subset P_(i).

We will now describe the channel assignment for the request. For each uncut route p_(i), channel number j is assigned to it where j satisfies p_(i)εP_(j). For each link traversed by p_(i), the channel numbered j of that link is assigned to p_(i). For each cut route p_(i), two channel numbers j_(a) and j_(b) are assigned to it, where the channel numbers correspond to the left residual path a_(i) and right residual path b_(i) of p_(i). In particular, j_(a) satisfies a_(i)εP_(ja), and j_(b) satisfies b_(i)εP_(jb). For each link traversed by p_(i), a channel is assigned to p_(i) as follows. If the link is traversed by a_(i) then the channel numbered j_(a) is assigned to p_(i). Otherwise, the link must be traversed by b_(i), and the channel numbered j_(b) is assigned to p_(i).

The desired channel assignment can be realized by setting the switches in the configured network appropriately, as shown in the example below.

Example: Consider the 4-node network of FIG. 1 redrawn in FIG. 2 with W=4 channels and let the request be

-   -   p₀=0-1-2     -   p₁=1-2-3     -   p₂=2-3-0-1     -   p₃=2-3-0     -   p₄=3-0-1-2         and     -   p₅=1-2-3         be as shown in the figure. Node 0 is the primary node. Then a         cut-and-color partition for the request is the routes with     -   P₀={p₀, a₂}     -   P₁={b₂,p₁,a₄}     -   P₂={b₄,p₃}         and     -   P₃={p₅}

where a₂=2-3-0, b₂=0-1 and a₄=3-0, b₄=0-1-2. Here a_(i) and b_(i) correspond to the cut routes of p_(i). Thus the individual routes would be assigned channels as shown below and in FIG. 2. Links Route 0 1 2 3 p₀ 0 0 — — p₁ — 1 1 — p₂ 1 — 0 0 p₃ — — 2 2 p₄ 2 2 — 1 p₅ — 3 3 — Configuration for Channel Degree 2

Suppose W is a power of two and N≧2 log₂ W−1. There is a configuration with channel degree two at each node with the following property. All requests that have load at most W are feasible.

The configuration attaches pairs of channels to form a permutation network. To be more specific, channels are attached according to a new graph H, which has the following properties:

-   -   The set of vertices of H may be organized into s+1 stages,         numbered 0, 1, . . . , s, where s≦N+1, such that there are W         vertices {u₀, . . . , u_(W−1)} at stage 0 and there are W         vertices {v₀, . . . , v_(W−1)} at stage s. For the sake of         discussion, label the vertices at stage 0 {u₀, . . . , u_(W−1)}         and the vertices at stage s {v₀, . . . , v_(W−1)}. We will also         refer to those stages i=1, 2, . . . , s−1 (i.e., those that are         not stage 0 or stage s) as the intermediate stages.     -   The set of edges of H are between consecutive stages of vertices         such that there are exactly W edges between stages. To be more         specific, for i=0, 1, . . . , s−1, there are W edges between         stage i and stage i+1.     -   Each vertex in the stage 0 has exactly one incident edge. Each         vertex in stage s has exactly one incident edge.

The graph H has the following additional property. Let any function f(·) on {0, . . . , W−1} be called a permutation if (f(0), . . . , f(W−1)) are distinct values of {0, . . . , W−1}. For example, if f(·) is a function on {0, 1, 2, 3} and (f(0), f(1), f(2), f(3))=(1, 3, 0, 2) then it would be a permutation on {0, 1, 2, 3}. Now H has the property that for any permutation π(·) on {0, . . . , W−1}, there is a collection (τ(·), h₀, h₁, . . . , h_(W−1)), where

-   -   τ(·) is a permutation on {0, . . . , W−1};     -   {h₀, h₁, . . . , h_(W−1)} is a collection of W paths in H;     -   for each i=0,1, . . . , W−1, path h_(i) starts at vertex         u_(τ(i)) in stage 0, traverses stages 1, 2, . . . , s−1 in         succession, and ends at vertex u_(τ(π(i))) in stage s; and     -   the paths {h₀, . . . , h_(W−1)} do not have common edges in H,         i.e., they are edge disjoint in H.         We will refer to the collection (τ(·), h₀, . . . , h_(W−1)) as         an interconnection instance for π(·).

The edges of H are assigned to the channels of the ring network as follows. The W edges of H between the vertices in stages 0 and 1 are assigned to the channels of link 0 such that for i=0,1, . . . , W−1, the edge incident to u_(i) of stage 0 is assigned to the channel numbered i. The W edges of H between vertices in stages s−1 and s are assigned to the channels of link (s−1) mod N such that for i=0,1, . . . , W−1, the edge incident to v_(i) of stage s is assigned to the channel numbered i. For i=1, . . . , s−2, the W edges of H between the vertices in stages i and (i+1) mod N are assigned to the W channels of link i mod N in the ring network. (Note that it is possible for two different stages of edges of H to be assigned to the channels of the same link, e.g., if s=N+1 then the edges between stages 0 and 1 and the edges between stages s−1 and s will both be assigned to the channels in link 0.) We will use the notation that if e is an edge in H then γ(e) is the channel it is assigned to.

The ring network is configured as follows. For i=1, 2, . . . , s−1, channels are attached through node i mod N of the ring network as follows: if e and e′ are edges of H such that e is between the stages i−1 and i of vertices, e′ is between stages i and i+1 of vertices, and e and e′ are incident to a common vertex in stage i then the channels γ(e) and γ(e′) are attached through node i. All other nodes of the ring network are configured so that there is no channel conversion.

A particular topology for H that leads to a network configuration of channel degree two at every node is the Benes interconnection network topology [12]. The Benes topology has s=2 log₂ W, so that it has 2 log₂ W+1 stages of vertices, where the stage 0 vertices {u₀, . . . , u_(W−1)} are the inputs of the Benes topology and stage s vertices {v₀, . . . , v_(W−1)} are the outputs. FIG. 3 shows the graph H for the case W=4. Here, there are 5 stages of vertices, where the stage 0 vertices are {u₀, u₁, u₂, u₃}, the stage 1 vertices are {x₀(1), x₁(1)}, the stage 2 vertices are {x₀(2), x₁(2)}, the stage 3 vertices are {x₀(3), x₁(3)}, and the stage 4 vertices are {v₀, v₁, v₂, v₃}. Also note that there are exactly W=4 edges between consecutive stages of vertices.

Notice that in a Benes topology H, vertices in an intermediate stage i have exactly two incident edges to vertices in stage i+1, and exactly two incident edges to vertices in stage i−1. This implies that in the resulting configured ring network, each node has channel degree at most two.

The Benes topology has the property that for any permutation π(·) on {0, . . . , W−1}, there is an interconnection instance (τ(·), h₀, . . . , h_(W−1)) such that τ(·) satisfies (τ(0), τ(1), . . . , τ(W−1))=(0,1, . . . , W−1), i.e., τ(·) is the identity function. Thus, for i=0, . . . , W−1, the path h_(i) starts at vertex u_(i) and ends at vertex v_(π(i)). The Benes topology is referred to as a permutation network since it has this property. FIG. 3 shows an example {h₀, h₁, h₂, h₃} for the permutation π(·) that satisfies (π(0), π(1), π(2), π(3))=(1,2,3,0) for the case when W=4. Here,

-   -   h₀=u₀−x₀(1)−x₁(2)−x₀(3)−v₁     -   h₁=u₁−x₀(1)−x₀(2)−x₁(3)−v₂     -   h₂=u₂−x₁(1)−x₁(2)−x₁(3)−v₃,         and     -   h₃=u₃−x₁(1)−x₀(2)−x₁(3)−v₂.

As an example of a network configuration consider a 4-node ring network with W=4 channels per link. Let H be the Benes network graph in FIG. 3. The edges of H between the stage 0 and stage 1 vertices are assigned to the channels of link 0. Similarly, the edges between stages 1 and 2 are assigned to the channels of link 1, the edges between stages 2 and 3 are assigned to the channels of link 2, and the edges between stages 3 and 4 are assigned to the channels of link 3. In the figure, the channel numbers for each edge are given. For example, edge x₀(1)−x₁(2) is assigned to a channel numbered 1 (in link 1), i.e., γ(x₀(1)−x₁(2)) is the channel numbered 1 in link 1. Notice that vertices u₀, u₁, u₂, and u₃ are assigned to channels numbered 0,1, 2, and 3, respectively. Also, vertices v₀, v₁, v₂, and v₃ are assigned to channels numbered 0,1, 2, and 3, respectively. Now, if a pair of edges of H are incident to a common vertex in stage i (i=1, . . . , s−1) and one edge is between stages i−1 and i and the other is between stages i and i+1 then their assigned channels are attached through node i. For example, edges x₀(1)−x₁(2) and x₁(2)−x₁(3) of H are incident to a common vertex x₁(2). Then their associated channels in the ring network (channel 1 of link 1 and channel 3 of link 2) are attached through node 2. Note that node 0 has no channel conversion. The corresponding wiring arrangement for the ring network configuration is shown in FIG. 4. Nodes 1, 2 and 3 realize a Benes network graph and node 0 is wired so that there is no channel conversion.

Once the ring network has been configured (with respect to some H), then a channel assignment can be found for any request that satisfies λ_(max)≦W. We will now describe a channel assignment for such a request {p₁, . . . ,P_(m)}, where m is the number of routes in the request.

First, a cut-and-color partition (P₀, . . . , P_(W−1)) is found for the request. Next, a permutation π(·) on {0,1, . . . , W−1} is found with the following property: for each cut route p_(i) of the request, consider its left residual path a_(i) and right residual path b_(i), and if the a_(i) is in P_(j) and b_(i) is in P_(k) then π(j)=k. We will refer to such a permutation as a permutation for the cut-and-color partition. (Note that there may be more than one permutation for a partition if the number of cut paths is less than W.)

One method to determine a permutation π(·) of the cut-and-color partition is as follows. Let Γ denote a set that equals {0, . . . , W−1}. Now for each cut route p_(i), of the request do the following: (1) determine the left residual path a_(i) and right residual path b_(i) of p_(i); (2) determine j_(a) and j_(b) such that a_(i)εP_(ja) and b_(i)εP_(jb); and then let π(j_(a))=j_(b) and remove the value j_(b) from the set Γ. For each i=0, . . . , W−1, such that the value of π(i) has yet to be determined, pick a value j from Γ, and then let π(i)=j and remove j from Γ. For example, suppose W=4 and the only cut routes of the request are p₁ and p₂. Suppose the cut-and-color partition (P₀, . . . , P₃) is such that a₁εP₂, b₁εP₃, a₂εP₃, and b₂εP₀. Then π(2)=3 and π(3)=0. This leaves the values of π(0) and π(1) yet to be determined. Their values should not be from the set {0, 3}, which have already been used. Thus, we can let π(0)=2 and π(1)=1 which will leave π(·) a permutation.

Now for each i=0, . . . , W−1, a collection of channels of the ring network is assigned to P_(i), one channel per link of the ring network. This is done as follows. For the graph H and permutation π(·) (of the cut-and-color partition), find the interconnection instance (τ(·), h₀,h₁ . . . , h_(W−1)). For each i=0, . . . , W−1, let

-   -   {e_(i)(0), e_(i)(1), . . . , e_(i)(j), . . . , e_(i)(s−2)}         denote the edges of H traversed by path h_(τ(i)), where e_(i(j))         is the one between stages j and j+1. Let     -   {g_(i)(0), g_(i)(1), . . . , g_(i)(j), . . . ,g_(i)(s−2)}         be the collection of channels of the ring network, where         g_(i)(j) is the channel assigned to edge e_(i)(j). i.e.,         g_(i)(j)=γ(e_(i)(j)). In addition, if s≦N then let     -   {g_(i)(s−1), g_(i)(s), g_(i)(s+1), . . . , g_(i)(j), . . . ,         g_(i)(N−1)}         be the collection of channels of the ring network, where         g_(i)(j) is the channel numbered τ(π(i)) of link j. The         collection     -   {g_(i)(0), g_(i)(1), . . . , g_(i)(N−1)}         are the channels assigned to P_(i).

The channel assignment for the request can now be determined. For each uncut route p_(i), assign channels to it as follows. Find k such that p_(i)εP_(k). For each link j of the ring network traversed by p_(i), assign channel g_(i)(j) to route p_(i).

For each cut route p_(i), assign channels to it as follows. Let a_(i) and b_(i) be the residual paths of p_(i). Find k_(a) and k_(b) such that a_(i)εP_(k) _(a) and b_(i)εP_(k) _(b) . For each link j traversed by a_(i), assign channel g_(k) _(a) (j) to route p_(i). For each link j traversed by b_(i), assign channel g_(k) _(b) (j) to route p_(i).

Example: As an example consider a 4-node ring network with W=4 channels per link and configured according to the H in FIG. 3. The corresponding wiring arrangement for the ring network configuration is shown in FIG. 4. Nodes 1, 2 and 3 realize a Benes interconnection network and node 0 is wired so that there is no conversion.

Consider the same request as in FIG. 2. The cut-and-color partition is the same as before. A permutation π(·) for the partition is

-   -   (π(0), π(1), π(2), π(3))=(1, 2, 3, 0).         (Notice, since there are only two cut routes in the request {p₀,         . . . , p₅}, that there are other permutations for the         partition, e.g., (π′(0), π′(1), π′(2), π′(3))=(1, 2, 0, 3).)

An interconnection instance (τ(·), h₀, h₁, h₂, h₃) for π(·) is where τ(−) is the identity function (i.e., (τ(0), τ(1), τ(2), τ(3))=(0,1, 2, 3)) and

-   -   h₀=u₀−x₀(1)−x₁(2)−x₀(3)−v₁,     -   h₁=u₁−x₀(1)−x₀(2)−x₁(3)−v₂,     -   h₂=u₂−x₁(1)−x₁(2)−x₁(3)−v₃,         and     -   h₃=u₃−x₁(1)−x₀(2)−x₀(3)−v₀,         as shown in FIG. 3. Equivalently, the paths traverse the         following edges of H:     -   h₀: u₀−x₀(1), x₀(1)−x₁(2), x₁(2)−x₀(3), x₀(3)−v₁,     -   h₁: u₁−x₀(1), x₀(1)−x₀(2), x₀(2)−x₁(3), x₁(3)−v₂,     -   h₂: u₂−x₁(1), x₁(1)−x₁(2), x₁(2)−x₁(3), x₁(3)−v₃,     -   h₃: u₃−x₁(1), x₁(1)−x₀(2), x₀(2)−x₀(3), x₀(3)−v₀.

Using the assignment of edges to channels, as shown in FIG. 3, we can get an assignment of channels to each P_(i) (i=0,1, 2, 3). For example, for P₀, we consider the edges traversed by h₀. The edge u₀−x₀(1) is assigned to channel 0 in link 0, the edge x₀(1)−x₁(2) is assigned to channel 1 in link 1, the edge x₁(2)−x₀(3) is assigned to channel 1 in link 2, and the edge x₀(3)−v₁ is assigned to channel 1 in link 3. The following are the channel assignments to each P_(i) (i=0,1,2,3). Channels Set Link 0 Link 1 Link 2 Link 3 P₀ 0 1 1 1 P₁ 1 0 2 2 P₂ 2 3 3 3 P₃ 3 2 0 0

Based on this, the individual routes are assigned channels. For example, consider an uncut route p₃=2-3-0. Notice that p₃εP₂, and so p₃ uses channels assigned to P₂. Since p₃ traverses links 2 and 3, its channels are (according to the table above) channel 3 in link 2 and channel 3 in link 3. As another example, consider the cut route p₂=2-3-0-1. Notice that p₂ has the residual paths a₂=2-3-0 and b₂=0-1. Notice that a₂εP₀, and so p₂ uses some of the channels assigned to P₀. In particular, since a₂ traverses links 2 and 3, the channels are (according to the table above) channel 1 in link 2 and channel 1 in link 3. Notice that b₂εP₁, and so p₂ uses a channel assigned to P₁. In particular, since b₂ traverses link 0, the channel.is (according to the table above) channel 1 in link 0.

The channel assignment for the request {p₀, . . . , p₅} is shown in the table below. Links Route 0 1 2 3 p₀ 0 1 — — p₁ — 0 2 — p₂ 1 — 1 1 p₃ — — 3 3 p₄ 2 3 — 2 p₅ — 2 0 —

The switching arrangement in the line cards to do this is shown in FIG. 5.

Configuration for Channel Degree Δ+1, where Δ>1

Consider a ring network with N≧log_(Δ) W nodes. There is a configuration that has channel degree at most Δ+1 at each node with the following property. All requests that have load at most W are feasible.

Consider the following network configuration. For each link i=0,1, . . . , N−1, its channel jε{0,1, . . . , W−1} is attached to the following channels on link (i+1) mod N: channel (j+1) mod W and channels {(j−k·Δ′) mod W: k=0,1, . . . , Δ−1}. Note that in this configuration, each node has channel degree at most Δ+1.

As an example consider the case of a 4-node ring network with W=4 channels per link, and Δ=2. Then for each link iε{0, 1, 2, 3}, its channel jε{0, 1, 2, 3} is attached to channels (j+1) mod 4, j, and (j−2^(i)) mod 4 on link (i+1) mod 4. For example, channel 1 on link 0 is attached to channels 2, 1, and 0 on link 1. As another example, note that channel 2 on link 3 is attached to channels 3 and 2 on link 0. The wiring arrangement is shown in FIG. 6. Now consider an arbitrary request {p₁, . . . , p_(m)} with load at most W. We will now describe how to find a channel assignment for it. We can find a cut-and-color partition (P₀, . . . , P_(w−1)) and a permutation π(·) for the partition as before. We will use the following definition. We call two numbers i and j in {0,1, . . . , W} to be π-related if there is a value k and a sequence (r₀, r₁, . . . , r_(k)) of numbers from {0, . . . , W−1} such that r₀=i, r_(k)=j, and for i=0,1, . . . , k−1, π(r_(i))=r_(i+1). For example, suppose W=8 and

-   -   (π(0), π(1), π(2), π(3), π(4), π(5), π(6), π(7))=(1, 3, 7, 5, 4,         0, 2, 6).         Note that π(0)=1, π(1)=3, π(3)=5, and π(5)=0. Thus, the numbers         {0,1,3,5} are π-related. Similarly, the numbers within the         following subsets are π-related: {2, 7, 6} and {4}.

Partition the set {0, . . . , W−1} into nonempty subsets {C₀, . . . , C_(M−1)}, where M is the number of subsets, such that numbers within a subset are π-related, while numbers from different subsets are not. Continuing with our example, the subsets could be C₀={0, 1, 3, 5}, C₁={2, 7, 6}, and C₂={4}. For each i=0, . . . , M−1, let s_(i) denote the size of C_(i). Then for the example, s₀=4, s₁=3, and s₂=1.

Define any subset of {0, . . . , W−1} as a contiguous subset if it can be written as

-   -   {(i+j) mod W: j=0, . . . , k}         for some i and k in {0, . . . , W−1}. Partition {0, . . . , W−1}         into W contiguous subsets (T₀, . . . , T_(M−1)) such that T_(i)         has size s_(i). This can be done by finding a collection of         numbers {t₀, . . . , t_(M−1)} from {0, . . . ,W−1} such that for         i=0, . . . , M−1,     -   t_((i+1) mod M)=(t_(i)+s_(i)) mod W         Then for i=0, . . . , M−1,     -   T_(i)={(t_(i)+j) mod W: j=0, . . . ,s_(i)−1}.         To continue with our example, we could have t₀=0, t₁=4, t₂=7, T₀         ={0,1, 2, 3}, T ₁={4,5,6}, and T₂={7}.

For i=0, . . . , M−1, find a function q_(i)(·) that is defined on the set {0, . . . ,s_(i)−1} such that

-   -   1. there is an element jεC_(i) such that q_(i)(j)=0 and     -   2. for each element jεC_(i), q_(i)(π(j))=(q_(i)(j)+1) mod s_(i).         To continue with our example, let us determine what q₀(·) should         be. Recall that C₀={0,1,3,5}, and that π(0)=1, π(1)=3, π(3)=5,         and π(5)=0. Then we could have (q₀(0), q₀(1), q₀(3), q₀(5))=(0,         1, 2, 3). Similarly, we could have (q₁(2), q₁(7), q₁(6))=(0,1,         2), and (q₂(4))=(0).

For k=0, . . . , M−1, let (d_(N−1)(k), d_(N−2)(k), . . . , d₀(k)) denote the base Δ, N digit representation of the value s_(k)−1. Now, for i=0, . . . ,N−1, let ${D_{i}(k)} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} {0,} & {{{if}\quad i} = 0} \\ {{\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{i - 1}{{d_{n}(k)} \cdot \Delta^{n}}},} & {{{if}\quad i} > 0} \end{matrix} \right.$ For example, if N=4, s_(k)−1=15, and Δ=2 then

-   -   (d₃(k), d₂(k), d₁(k), d₀(k))=the binary number (1,1,1,1),         and     -   (D₃(k), D₂(k), D₁(k), D₀(k))=(7, 3,1, 0).         As another example, if N=3, s_(k)−1=15, and Δ=3 then     -   (d₂(k), d₁(k), d₀(k))=the ternary number (1,2,0),         and     -   (D₂(k), D₁(k), D₀(k))=(6, 0, 0).

For each subset P_(i)(i=0, . . . , W−1) from the cut-and-color partition, we assign it channels as follows. The channels assigned to P_(i) will be denoted by σ(i, 0), σ(i, 1), . . . , σ(i, j), . . . , σ(i, N−1) where σ(i, j) is the channel on link j. Let k be such that P_(i)εC_(k). For j=0, . . . , N−1, let ρ(i, j) be the following value ${\rho\left( {i,j} \right)} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} {{s_{k} - 1 - {D_{j}(k)}},} & {{{if}\quad{q_{k}(i)}} = {s_{k} - 1}} \\ {{q_{k}(i)},} & {{{if}\quad{q_{k}(i)}} < {s_{k} - {1\quad{and}\quad{q_{k}(i)}}} < {s_{k} - 1 - {D_{j}(k)}}} \\ {{{q_{k}(i)} + 1},} & {{{if}\quad{q_{k}(i)}} < {s_{k} - {1\quad{and}\quad{q_{k}(i)}}} \geq {s_{k} - 1 - {D_{j}(k)}}} \end{matrix} \right.$ For j=0, . . . , N−1, let σ(i, j)=(t_(k)+ρ(i, j)) mod W. For example, suppose N=4, Δ=2, W=32, and C_(k)={4, 5, . . . , 11}. Here, note that s_(k)=8,

-   -   (d₃(k), d₂(k), d₁(k), d₀(k))=(0,1, 1, 1),         and     -   (D₃(k), D₂(k), D₁(k), D₀(k))=(7, 3,1, 0).         Suppose that     -   (π(4), π(5), . . . , π(11)=(5,6, . . . ,11,4)         and     -   (q_(k)(4),q_(k)(5), . . . ,q_(k)(11))=(0, 1, . . . ,6, 7).

In addition, to simplify the example, suppose that t_(k)=0, so that σ(i,j)=ρ(i,j) for all iεC_(k). Then we have the following channel assignment for the subsets in C_(k): Sets Link P₄ P₅ P₆ P₇ P₈ P₉ P₁₀ P₁₁ 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 7 6 2 0 1 2 3 5 6 7 4 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0

The values of σ(l,j), where lεC_(k), can be read from the table. For example, the channels assigned to P₈ are channel σ(8, 0)=4 in link 0, channel σ(8, 1)=4 in link 1, channel σ(8,2)=5 in link 2, and channel σ(8, 3)=5 in link 3. To see what the table looks like when t_(k) is not zero, suppose the t_(k) were changed to 10. Then the following channel assignment for the subsets in C_(k) would result. Sets Link P₄ P₅ P₆ P₇ P₈ P₉ P₁₀ P₁₁ 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 16 2 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 14 3 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10

Channels can be assigned to each route p_(k) of the request as follows. Suppose p_(k) is an uncut route. Let i be such that p_(k)εP_(i). For each link j that is traversed by p_(k), the channel σ(i, j) of the link is assigned to p_(k). Suppose p_(k) is a cut route. Let a_(k) and b_(k) be its residual paths. Let i_(a) and i_(b) be such that a_(k)εP_(i) and b_(k)εP_(i) _(b) . For each link j that is traversed by a_(k), the channel σ(i_(a), j) of the link is assigned to p_(k). For each link j that is traversed by b_(k), the channel σ(i_(b),j) of the link is assigned to p_(k).

Example: Consider a 4-node ring network that has W=4 channels per link, and where it is configured according to Δ=2. Hence, the wiring arrangement in the line cards is shown in FIG. 6.

Suppose the requests are shown in FIG. 2. The cut-and-color partition and the permutation π(·) for the partition is the same as before. Thus, (π(0), π(1), π(2), π(3))=(1, 2, 3, 0). Then we have C₀={0, 1, 2, 3}, s₀=4,

-   -   (d₃(0), d₂(0), d₁(0), d₀(0))=(0, 0,1,1),     -   (D₃(0), D₂(0), D₁(0), D₀(0))=(3, 3,1, 0),         and     -   (q₀(0), q₀(1), q₀(2), q₀(3))=(0, 1, 2, 3)

Thus the sets P₀, P₁, P₂, P₃ are assigned channels on the links as follows: Links Set 0 1 2 3 P₀ 0 0 1 1 P₁ 1 1 2 2 P₂ 2 3 3 3 P₃ 3 2 0 0

Based on this, the individual routes are assigned channels as given below: Links Route 0 1 2 3 p₀ 0 0 — — p₁ — 1 2 — p₂ 1 — 1 1 p₃ — — 3 3 p₄ 2 3 — 2 p₅ — 2 0 —

The switch settings corresponding to this assignment are shown in FIG. 7.

Star Network

FIG. 8 shows the block diagram of multiplexors 101 connected in a star network configuration. The network consists of a hub node 102H and spoke nodes 102E. The spoke nodes are connected to the hub node by a transmission link or medium 103. Each spoke node 102E in the network consists of a multiplexor. The hub node consists of a multiplexor for each link (or each spoke node) in the network. The multiplexors in the hub node are wired together according to a specified pattern. The figure shows 4 channels on each link. For each channel there is a line card 104 within each multiplexor. A line card consists of an I/O port 105, multiple local ports 106 and a line port 107 and a switch (not shown in the figure) that allows any pairs of these ports to be connected together.

Our results use the following network configuration of channels when W, the number of channels per link, is even. Each link has its channel i=0,1, . . . , W/2−1 connected to channel w(i) (through the hub node) on all the other links, where w(i)=i+W/2. We will denote the hub node by h, and the spoke nodes by x₁, . . . , x_(N−1). For i=1, . . . , N−1, let e_(i) denote the link between nodes h and x_(i).

Once the network is configured, a channel assignment may be found for any request that has load at most W and each route of the request traverses at most two links. The following is the procedure to find a channel assignment. Let {p₁, . . . ,P_(M)} denote the routes of the request. Let {p₁, . . . , P_(m)} denote the routes that traverse exactly two links. Hence, the routes {P_(m+1), . . . , p_(M)} denote the ones that traverse exactly one link.

We will refer to a path as being incident to its end nodes. For example, a path that traverses a sequence of nodes (x_(i), h, x_(j)) (hence, it traverses exactly two links), is considered to be incident to its end nodes x_(i) and x_(j) (here, h is an intermediate node). As another example, a path that traverses the sequence of nodes (x_(i), h) (hence, it traverses exactly one link), is considered to be incident to its end nodes x_(i) and h.

A path may be directed, which means that it is viewed as going from one of its end nodes to its other end node. For example, if a path traverses two links and has end nodes x_(i) and x_(j) then it may be directed from x_(i) to h and then to x_(j), or it may be directed from x_(j) to h and then to x_(i). If a path traverses one link and has end nodes x_(i) and h then it may be directed from x_(i) to h, or it may be directed from h to x_(i). As part of the channel assignment procedure, the routes {p₁, . . . , p_(m)} will be directed so that at each spoke node there are at most W/2 incident routes of {p₁, . . . , p_(m)} that are directed into the node, and at most W/2 incident routes of {p₁, . . . ,p_(m)} that are directed out of the node. The procedure to direct these routes is as follows.

If the number of routes of {p₁, . . . ,p_(M)} that traverse each link is exactly W then let R=M. Otherwise, find additional paths {p_(M+1), . . . ,p_(R)} such the number of routes of {p₁, . . . ,p_(R)} that traverse each link is exactly W. The additional paths {p_(M+1), . . . , p_(R)} are referred to as dummy paths. Note that the dummy paths can be found as follows. For i=1, . . . , N−1, let there be W−n_(i) dummy paths, each traversing only link e_(i), where n_(i) is the number of routes (that are not dummy paths) traversing link e_(i).

The paths of {p₁, . . . ,p_(R)} are directed as follows. Consider each path of {p₁, . . . , p_(R)} as being initially undirected. Refer to a node that has at least one undirected incident path as a free node. As long as there is a free node, do the following:

-   -   1. Start from a free node, say x_(i), and traverse an undirected         incident path (from the set {p₁, . . . , p_(R)}) to the other         end node, and direct the path in the direction of the traversal.     -   2. From the other end node, traverse an undirected incident path         (from the set {p₁, . . . , p_(R)}) to the next end node, and         direct the path in the direction of the traversal.     -   3. Keep traversing undirected paths (and directing the traversed         paths) in this way until node x_(i) is reached.

Now construct a bipartite graph G which has two sets of vertices: {u₁, . . . , u_(N−1)} and {v₁, . . . , v_(N-1)}. It has edges b₁, . . . ,b_(m), where b_(i) is between u_(j) and v_(k) if path p_(i) traverses links e_(j) and e_(k) in the star network and p_(i) is directed so that it goes from node x_(j) to h and then to x_(k). Note that in G, each vertex has at most W/2 incident edges because each spoke node of the star network has at most W/2 incoming incident paths and at most W/2 outgoing incident paths. Next, assign numbers {0, . . . , W/2−1} to the edges of G such that distinct numbers are assigned to edges incident to a common node, and denote the number assigned to link b_(i) (for i=1, . . . , m) by q(b_(i)). This can be accomplished using the scheduling algorithms used for Satellite Switched/Time Division Multiple Access (SS/TDMA) systems [13], incorporated herein by reference. Using the assignment of numbers, we can get a channel assignment for the routes {p₁, . . . ,p_(m)} as follows. For i=1, . . . , m, suppose p_(i) traverses links e_(j) and e_(k) such that the direction of p_(i) goes from x_(j) to h and then to x_(k). Then channel q(b_(i)) on link e_(j) is assigned to p_(i), and the channel w(q(b_(i))) on link e_(k) is also assigned to p_(i).

Note that up to this point, channels have been assigned to the routes {p₁, . . . , p_(m)} Now channels will be assigned to the routes {p_(m+1), . . . , p_(M)} (i.e., the routes that traverse exactly one link). This can be done by selecting each route and assigning it a channel on the link that it traverses that has yet to be assigned to a route.

Example: Consider the five node star network of FIG. 8, redrawn in FIG. 9(A). The network has a hub node h, and four spoke nodes {x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄}. Note that for i=1,2,3,4, spoke node x_(i) and hub node h have link e_(i) between them. Note that each link has W=4 channels numbered 0,1,2,3. These channel numbers are partitioned into two groups: {0, 1} and {2, 3}. Note that w(0)=2 and w(1)=3. The hub node is configured so that for i=0, 1, a channel i at each link is connected to channel w(i) at all the other links.

Now suppose there is a request {p₁, p₂, . . . ,p₆} of six routes as shown in FIG. 9(A). These routes are as follows:

-   -   p₁=x₁-h-x₂     -   p₂=x₂-h-x₃     -   p₃=x₃-h-x₁     -   p₄=x₁-h-x₄     -   p₅=x₃-h-x₄         and     -   p₆=x₃-h-x₁.         Note that there are W=4 routes of the request traversing links         e₁ and e₃, but there are only two routes of the request         traversing links e₂ and e₄. Dummy paths p₇, p₈, p₉, and p₁₀ are         found for the links e₂ and e₄ as shown in FIG. 9(A). Note that         the paths p₇ and p₈ only traverse link e₂, and paths p₉ and p₁₀         only traverse link e₄. Now each link has exactly W=4 paths         traversing it.

Paths p₁, . . . , p₁₀ are intially considered undirected. Then they are directed as follows. First a node is chosen that has an undirected path incident to it (i.e., a free node is chosen). Node x₁ is such a node since it has undirected paths P₁, p₃, p₄, p₆ incident to it. One of the undirected incident paths is chosen to be traversed, say path P₁. After traversing it to node x₂, it is directed from end node x₁ to end node x₂. From node x₂, an undirected incident path is chosen to be traverse. Such paths are p₂, p₇, p₈. Suppose path p₂ is chosen. After traversing it to node x₃, it is directed from end node x₂ to end node x₃. From node x₃, an undirected incident path is chosen to be traversed. Such paths are p₃, p₅, p₆. Suppose path p₃ is chosen. After traversing it to node x₁, it is directed from end node x₃ to end node x₁. Note that the paths p₁, p₂, p₃ are directed as shown in FIG. 9(B). Since we returned to node x₁, we start the procedure of directing paths all over again. FIG. 9(B) shows the direction of paths p₄, p₅, p₆ which results by starting from node x₄ and traversing paths p₅, p₆, and then p₄. FIG. 9(B) also shows the direction of paths p₇, p₈, p₉, p₁₀ which results by starting from node x₂ and traversing paths p₇, p₉, p₁₀, and then p₈. Note that we have the following directions for the paths:

-   -   p₁=x₁→h→x₂     -   p₂=x₂→h→x₃     -   p₃=x₃→h→x₁     -   p₄=x₁→h→x₄     -   p₅=x₄→h→x₃     -   p₆=x₃→h→x₁     -   p₇=x₂→h     -   p₈=h→x₂     -   p₉=h→x₄         and     -   p₁₀=x₄→h.

We now construct a bipartite graph G, as shown in FIG. 9(C), with two sets of vertices {u₁, u₂, u₃, u₄} and {v₁, v₂, v₃, v₄}. There are six edges between the nodes denoted by {b₁, b₂, . . . , b₆}. For i=1, . . . , 6, the edge b_(i) corresponds to the route p_(i) in the request. If p_(i) has end nodes x_(j) and x_(k) and is directed from x_(j) to x_(k) then edge b_(i) is between vertices u_(j) and v_(k). Thus, the edges of G are

-   -   b₁=u₁-v₂     -   b₂=u₂-v₃     -   b₃=u₃-v₁     -   b₄=u₁-v₄     -   b₅=u₄-v₃         and     -   b₆=u₃-v₁.

Numbers from the set {0, 1} (i.e., {0, . . . , W/2−1}) are assigned to the edges of G so that at each vertex of G, its incident edges have distinct numbers. The number assigned to edge b_(i) will be denoted by q(b_(i)). A number assignment is shown in FIG. 9(C). Here, q(b₁)=0, q(b₂)=1, q(b₃)=0, q(b₄)=1, q(b₅)=0, and q(b₆)=1. Note that the SS/TDMA scheduling algorithm can be used to determine q(b_(i)) for each edge b_(i) of G.

The channel assignment to the routes are as follows. Note that p₁ corresponds to b₁, which has end vertices u₁ and v₂. Note that u₁ corresponds to link e₁, and v₂ corresponds to link e₂. The channels assigned to p₁ are channel q(b₁)=0 on link e₁ and channel w(q(b₁))=2 on link e₂. The channel assignment for all the routes of the request are given below:

-   -   p₁: channel 0 on link e₁, and channel 2 on link e₂,     -   p₂: channel 1 on link e₂, and channel 3 on link e₃,     -   p₃: channel 0 on link e₃, and channel 2 on link e₁,     -   p₄: channel 1 on link e₁, and channel 3 on link e₄,     -   p₅: channel 0 on link e₄, and channel 2 on link e₃,         and     -   p₆: channel 1 on link e₃, and channel 3 on link e₁.

The corresponding setting of the switches and channel assignment in the network are shown in FIG. 10 for routes p_(i), p₂ and p₃ as an illustration.

Arbitrary Topology Networks

Consider an arbitrary topology network such that each link has W channels, where W is even. Then the following method gives a fixed conversion configuration of the network and a channel assignment that assigns channels for any set of connections with routes that have congestion at most W and have at most two hops.

The channel assignment is done by converting the given network into a star network as follows. Each link i′ in the star network corresponds to a link i in the original network. A connection that is to be routed on links i and j in the original network is now to be routed on links i′ and j′ in the star network. The congestion in the star network is at most W and hence these connections can be routed using the results of the star configuration. 

1. A method of configuring a node comprising: adapting the node to connect to a ring network; configuring the node for full channel conversion; and adapting the node to connect to a second node on the ring network that is configured for no channel conversion.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising adapting the node to accommodate a channel assignment that uses a path passing through the node.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising adapting the node to demultiplex any channels input to the node and multiplex any channels output of the node.
 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising adapting the node to connect to a first and a second link on the ring network, the links each having a plurality of channels.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the links are optical fiber links.
 6. The method of claim 4, wherein full channel conversion is an ability to connect each in the plurality of channels on the first link to each in the plurality of channels on the second link.
 7. The method of claim 4, wherein no channel conversion is an ability to connect each in the plurality of channels on the first link to only a corresponding channel on the second link.
 8. A node configuration comprising: a node adapted to be connected to a ring network, wherein the node is configured for full channel conversion and is adapted to be connected to a second node on the ring network that is configured for no channel conversion.
 9. The node configuration of claim 8, wherein the node is adapted to accommodate a channel assignment that uses a path passing through the node.
 10. The node configuration of claim 8, further comprising adapting the node to demultiplex any channels input to the node and multiplex any channels output of the node.
 11. The node configuration of claim 8, wherein the node is adapted to connect to a first and a second link, the links each having a plurality of channels.
 12. The node configuration of claim 11, wherein the links are optical fiber links.
 13. The node configuration of claim 11, wherein full channel conversion is an ability to connect each in the plurality of channels on the first link to each of the channels on the second link.
 14. The node configuration of claim 11, wherein no channel conversion is an ability to connect each in the plurality of channels on the first link to only a corresponding channel on the second link.
 15. A method of configuring a node comprising: adapting the node to connect to a first and a second link on a ring network, the links each having a plurality of channels; and configuring the node so that each in the plurality of channels on the first link can be switched to no more than two in the plurality of channels on the second link.
 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising adapting the node to accommodate a channel assignment that uses a path passing through the node.
 17. The method of claim 15, wherein the first and second links are optical fiber links.
 18. The method of claim 15, further comprising adapting the node to demultiplex any channels input to the node and multiplex any channels output of the node.
 19. The method of claim 15, wherein the plurality of channels is a power of
 2. 20. The method of claim 15, wherein the ring network has total nodes greater than or equal to 2 log₂ of the plurality of channels minus one.
 21. A node configured comprising: an input port to which a first link on a ring network can be connected, the first link having a plurality of channels; and an output port to which a second link on the ring network can be connected, the second link having a plurality of channels; wherein each in the plurality of channels on the first link can be switched to no more than two in the plurality of channels on the second link.
 22. The node of claim 21, wherein the node is adapted to accommodate a channel assignment that uses a path passing through the node.
 23. The node of claim 21, wherein the first and second links are optical fiber links.
 24. The node of claim 21, further comprising adapting the node to demultiplex any channels input to the node and multiplex any channels output of the node.
 25. The node of claim 21, wherein the plurality of channels is a power of
 2. 26. The node of claim 21, wherein the ring network has total nodes greater than or equal to 2 log₂ of the plurality of channels minus one. 